Nikon Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm F/5.6E ED VR Lens Subjective Review

Disclaimer

The author of this article is the equipment control of the pit pit factory, the camera level is very poor, and the view is too subjective, please readers to identify, do not like the upper right corner.

I do not know if anyone has ever written this shot. For the first time writing out of the box, I still don’t want people who need this head to miss such a good head. From the moment I just left, I’m worried for a long time. The head of the 500mm focal length is Prior to this, the original civil class was only 100-400, but the price did not bear it. After reading Kenrockwell's review and MTF, the shot was already overwhelming, but according to Nikon's urine, the point of purchase was debatable. After spending a long time in the 8000 or so, I suddenly found that I entered the 7000 range. After several months of pave the way for the LD, I finally started. Tucao about, Rui X licensed, 10 postage.


Subjective feelings. Poor only ip5c, just out of the box will be right. The packaging is very good, there are buffers up and down, there are channels downwind, and there are no white flowers in 10, but they must be noted to the store, otherwise it may be thrown directly into the box. Big, the first impression is big, the outer packaging will make people collapse, and it is not a little bit bigger than DZP. Workmanship does not compromise, although it is a low-end, focus zoom ring is very smooth, of course, you do not take zeiss head ratio, better than another 70300vr cost-effective is not a little bit better (Tucao about this I recommend a lot of lenses, that zoom Ring hand astringent want people to use xx fluid). However, when holding it, unlike the front of the DZP, rubber can be held. When this head is used, it does not know where to put the left hand, and ergonomics can cause people to collapse. Because of heavy reasons, I did not remove the tripod ring when I was using it. Instead, I had to hold the tripod ring to take a picture. Generally, I would take a group of photos and my hands became sore that I could only use a monopod when I was photographing. Not for stability, it is to save energy. Previously I felt that the SLR lens was not a problem with weight. It was not a single camera. The camera didn't need to be small and compact. Everything was for the picture quality, but I was wrong. First of all, the female user of this lens should not think about it. For non-unicorn users, it should not be thought of. For the travel party, don’t think too much. For the picture quality party, you have to think about it. It’s not that the picture quality is not good (the quality of the picture is incredibly good, after that), but that in order to bring this shot, you’ll lose a lot. The space of other lenses (under the lens combination). It is not the internal zoom. If you go out to fight birds, you have to consider the durability. Even if you do not say that it is a plastic lens barrel, you will enter the ash. It is estimated that it is not good to handle. There is also UV that is not easy to buy, but I do not use uv. The shortcomings, for the time being, if not, is that the focusing speed is a bit slow, and there seems to be more power consumption. When the length is fully open, it is longer than the keyboard. Without the hood and the body can be put into a backpack. When the camera body and the lens are together, they cannot be put into a backpack. I have a backpack at a relatively low end, and I will measure it myself. Then Tucao, my moisture cabinet can not fit, looking for a plastic box covered with a layer of dry beads.

2, picture quality. I have never used one of the sharpest shots. I have used less of my head. I always thought that Budweiser was the most potent pit, but after using this one, I discovered that there was no problem with full-on shots. White Do not entangled with the gold circle, it is a lens with a tripod, shrinking a few files is the same for you. The personal subjective feeling is that there is no pressure between the 200-end and DZP. Before buying, I felt that the 5.6's head aperture was too small. After use, I found no pressure. If the big aperture was out of focus, the party would still choose carefully. Although the colors are not so gorgeous and oily, they are still much better than Budweiser, and they are better than DZP. In today's era, the progress of science and technology is so fast that the lens of nb can no longer withstand the years. Don't entangled with the gold circle and the big aperture. New and cheap shots. In the cow's head, there is only one tripod to the dog's head. How is the 200 end sharp, and the 500 end corner is a little bit worse, just shoot portraits, the center quality is very sharp, I only received F8-F9 at most, is enough to reach the limit of my camera, too small Handheld is not good, this vr is also used the best vr, full open iso200 case, 100 seconds can use this camera, I also realized for the first time the importance of the replacement of the fuselage, (I have been Both use the D90 before using the expired body, and later change the D610). The resolution of the lens has greatly exceeded the limit of the camera.

3, purchase the use of advice and other. Let me first talk about my out-of-the-lens use combination, which is generally Kim Kwang, ais3570 3.5, Budweiser (DZP) (Zeiss 85), but if it is to go out with this, I will only have a 35 1.8 (50 1.8) (a7 is responsible for the wide angle In part), this is why I say that the picture quality party also needs to consider because this cargo will greatly reduce the space and focal length of your shot. For Xiao Bai, I do not recommend buying this because there are too few opportunities to use it. For the focal segment completion user, I recommend 55-200 70-300vr. For the picture quality party, the combination of 105vr and DZP is sufficient. For the portrait party, you can give it a try. The portrait at the 500 end has a different kind of feeling, but you may feel that the focus is not enough milk. For bird users, you should neither see me on this BB. For a party, you know it. If you are a self-driving party, a telephoto enthusiast, an equipment controller, or an obese patient, it's okay to find a busy egg to hurt users and you can start off. For this price, besides 18-55 Bo Wei, we can not find nikon higher cost than this lens.

4, a few garbage samples, my level does not represent the true level of the lens, and Zhang Mama this slag quality, the details of the film will be pressed slag is not left!


That is all

By the way, bb, a7's lens is very expensive. If you have any questions, you can be careful. If you have any questions, you can reply to the exchanges. The opinions are subjective. Please arguing, please bypass. Thank you for your effort, but few people should watch it.

Posted on