On the humidification and dehumidification method of the damp heat test box - Database & Sql Blog Articles

Probe domestic switch needle KG-300K, needle head diameter is 3.0mm, normally open switch needle

Test - lowercase jpg

Kaixin micro test

Study on Humidification and Dehumidification Methods of Damp Heat Test Chambers

This paper provides an in-depth analysis and comprehensive discussion on the humidification and dehumidification techniques used in damp heat test chambers. The findings are particularly useful for engineers involved in the development of new damp heat test equipment, offering insights into practical applications and system design improvements.

To meet the required testing conditions, damp heat test chambers must effectively control both humidity and temperature. This study reviews a wide range of current methods used in such chambers, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, and potential areas for improvement. It aims to guide engineers in selecting the most suitable approach based on specific test requirements.

Humidity is commonly expressed using relative humidity, which refers to the ratio of the water vapor pressure in the air to the saturated vapor pressure at a given temperature, usually presented as a percentage. The saturation vapor pressure of water is primarily dependent on temperature rather than atmospheric pressure. Through extensive research and data collection, a well-established relationship between temperature and vapor pressure has been developed, often calculated using the Goff-Gratch formula, widely adopted by meteorological agencies for humidity calculations.

Humidification involves increasing the partial pressure of water vapor. One of the earliest methods was spraying water onto the chamber walls, where the water surface's saturation pressure was controlled by adjusting the water temperature. This method allowed water vapor to diffuse into the chamber, gradually increasing relative humidity. However, due to the slow response of early humidity control systems, this approach was not ideal for alternating humidity cycles. Additionally, water droplets could fall on the test samples, causing contamination and requiring careful drainage management. As a result, this method was eventually replaced by steam and shallow pan humidification, though it still offers benefits like stable humidity levels and no additional heat generation during the process.

As damp heat testing evolved from constant to alternating conditions, faster humidification responses became necessary. Steam and shallow pan humidification methods gained popularity due to their efficiency. When water reaches its boiling point, the vapor pressure exceeds standard atmospheric pressure, allowing for rapid humidification through steam injection. While effective, this method introduces excess heat, which may require refrigeration to balance. If not properly managed, this can lead to condensation and further humidity fluctuations.

The shallow pan humidifier combines features of both spray and steam methods. A water tray with a large surface area is placed inside the chamber, heated to increase vapor pressure. This enhances diffusion and moisture exchange without adding significant heat. However, during low-humidity tests, controlling the water temperature becomes more challenging, and draining the water during cold tests adds operational complexity. Microbial growth in the tray is also a concern if the chamber is unused for long periods.

Modern test chambers often incorporate cooling systems, especially when testing high-heat-emitting samples. During refrigeration, the evaporator removes moisture from the air, potentially reducing humidity. To address this, subcooled steam humidification methods have been developed. These use fine mist generated by ultrasonic or high-pressure spray techniques, which vaporize upon contact with the sample’s heat, effectively raising humidity without excessive temperature rise. This method has proven efficient and is increasingly used in advanced testing environments.

Dehumidification is typically achieved through two main methods: freezing and solid desiccants. Freezing dehumidification condenses moisture on a cooled surface, but frost buildup can reduce effectiveness over time. Maintaining the cooler above 0°C helps prevent this, making it a common choice for many applications. For lower dew points, solid desiccants like silica gel or molecular sieves are used, capable of achieving dew points as low as -70°C. However, these systems are more expensive and complex, reserved for specialized testing scenarios such as low-temperature engine trials, where maintaining dry air is critical.